employee
Moscow, Russian Federation
This article examines the place of the municipal enterprises in the service of the local community in general, and in the rendering of municipal services in particular. The methods of services rendering by individual municipal authority or enterprise and the directly by local authorities are compared. These models vary considerably in efficiency and organizational support. These differences allow get answer to the question of the expediency of involving the municipal enterprises to the rendering of municipal services. The author defines the criteria, which allow assessing the place of municipal enterprises in considered sphere and getting answer to the question of the expediency of involving of municipal enterprises in the economy of the territory. The research also focuses on ways to improve efficiency, accountability and transparency of the management of municipal enterprises. A significant part of the impact and mechanism of direct responsibility to the people must be supported with the help of supervision of municipal services, otherwise there is a great temptation to start uncontrolled expansion and implement investments in new assets without appropriate investments in other municipal spheres. The activity of local authorities satisfies these criteria better than the performance of individual municipal enterprises. The financial independence of the last mentioned more contributes to attempts to build empires and unjustified costs. Municipal enterprises do not have unique advantages; their existence creates or contributes to the creation of problems in the sphere of decision-making, and also leads to unnecessary costs for the local authorities and population. Their abolishment would increase the efficiency, accountability and transparency of the public sector.
municipal services, local government, municipal enterprises, the powers of the authorities of local governments
Предоставляют ли муниципальные предприятия услуги, которые не могут
предоставляться непосредственно местными органами власти (местным или
муниципальным советом) или не могут предоставляться ими с той же степенью
эффективности? Одним из аргументов в пользу муниципальных предприятий является
предположение о том, что назначенные или избранные члены управляющего совета
предприятия будут осуществлять более эффективное управление, чем ответственные за
широкий спектр местных услуг выборные политики.
1. Proceedings Public-Private Partnerships in Infrastructure Days 2008. December 15- 18, 2008. Washington, D.C. - World Bank, World Bank Institute, 2009. - 81 s.
2. Goncharova O. Povyshenie kachestva munitsipal´nykh uslug - trebovanie vremeni. Standarty i kachestvo. - 2006. - № 10. - S. 78-79.
3. Kulikova A.A. Sovershenstvovanie funktsionirovaniya kazennogo predpriyatiya: monografiya. - LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing, 2013. - 168 s.
4. Monitoring v sfere predostavleniya gosudarstvennykh i munitsipal´nykh uslug: monografiya / V.Yu. Morozov, S.V. Shestakova, V.A. Shestakov, A.G. Abadzhidi. - M.: FGOU VPO «RGUTiS», 2010. - 117 s.
5. Panova A.G. Problemy kontrolya i otsenki kachestva gosudarstvennykh i munitsipal´nykh uslug. «Servis v Rossii i zarubezhom». - 2011. - №6. [Elektronnyy resurs]: URL: http://old.rguts.ru/electronic_journal/number25/contents (data obrashcheniya: 03.10.15).
6. Panova A.G Effektivnoe raspredelenie resursov mezhdu razlichnymi munitsipal´nymi predpriyatiyami. Vestnik universiteta. -2011. - №22. - S. 186-188.
7. Parshin M.V. Kachestvo gosudarstvennykh i munitsipal´nykh uslug: na puti k servisnomu gosudarstvu. - M.: Statut, 2013. - 272 s.
8. Khodorich I.A. Formirovanie i razvitie modeley mestnogo samoupravleniya. Inzhenernyy vestnik Dona. - 2009. - №2 [Elektronnyy resurs]: URL: http://www.ivdon.ru/magazine/archive/n2y2009/134 (data obrashcheniya: 10.10.15).
9. Tsydypova I.B. Osobennosti otsenki effektivnosti deyatel´nosti organov ispolnitel´noy vlasti regiona. Perspektivy nauki. - 2013. №11 (50). - S. 134-137.
10. Shestakova S.V., Khavanova N.V., Novikova N.G. Puti resheniya problem sotrudnichestva gosudarstvennykh, chastnykh i nekommercheskikh organizatsiy v predostavlenii elektronnykh gosudarstvennykh i munitsipal´nykh uslug. Servis v Rossii i za rubezhom. - 2012. - № 11 (38). [Elektronnyy resurs]: URL: http://old.rguts.ru/electronic_journal/number38/contents (data obrashcheniya: 04.10.15).
