The structure of the organization of territorial recreational system of specially protected natural territories of the Crimea Republic is demonstrated. The features of the sectoral and territorial organization of the recreational system of specially protected natural areas in the region are described. The reunification of the Crimea with Russia pulls broad prospects for the development of recreational activities within the protected areas. Of particular relevance is consideration of the particular sectoral and territorial organization in the transition period of Crimea recreation in the legislative field of the Russian Federation and the prospects for its further development. Considering the features of the organization of recreational activities in the protected areas of the Crimea, noted a wide range of works on recreational geography of Crimea. Territorial recreational system within protected areas can be represented as a historically established combination of interconnected components of diverse environmental and recreational sector, formed in the natural-ecological and socio-economic environment of the region to maintain the prevailing environmental functions of territories and comfortable environment in which the recreational functions within the protected areas can be performed. Sectoral structure ofTerritorial recreational system has a rather complex structure and is largely dependent on the type of protected area and a set of constraints of environmental management and conservation within it. In the sectoral structure distinguished are three possible units: tourism and recreation, the complex of public services´ sectors, the complex of related industries. In terms of socio-geographical research the components of sectoral and territorial system T of Territorial recreational system must ensure the optimal geo-ecological and socio-economic mix of the functions of protected areas and to provide a contribution to sustainable development of the regions, providing the co-adaptation of the natural and recreational systems, increasing the level of environmental and recreational development of the territory.
recreation system, branch structure, territorial structure, specially protected natural area, the Republic of Crimea
Введение. Формирование представлений об анализе рекреационной деятельности на особо охраняемых природных территориях имеет достаточно длительную и методически и практически насыщенную историю научного развития, тесно связанную с процессом формирования рекреационной географии как науки. Система особо охраняемых природных территорий (ООПТ) является основой сохранения
естественных ландшафтов любого региона. С другой стороны, природные ресурсы ООПТ являются рекреационным аттрактором, и развитие рекреационной деятельности представляется весомым звеном в экономике многих регионов, в т.ч. и Республики Крым. Современные научные представления и нормативные положения, закрепленные в системе экологического права, позволяют осуществлять рекреаци-
1. Bioraznoobrazie Kryma: otsenka i potrebnosti sokhraneniya / Pod red. V.V. Korzhenevskogo, V.A. Bokova, A.I. Dulitskogo. Gurzuf: Biodiversity Support Program, 1997.131 s.
2. Vetrova N.M. Ekologicheskaya bezopasnost´ rekreatsionnogo regiona: Monografiya. Simferopol´: RIO NAPKS, 2006. 297 s.
3. Vetrova N.M., Fedorkin SI. Obespechenie ekologicheskoy bezopasnosti rekreatsionnogo regiona: Monografiya. Simferopol´: IT «ARIAL», 2012. 294 s.
4. Ena V.G., Ena Al.V., Ena An.V. O prirodnom natsional´nom parke v Krymu/ Voprosy razvitiya Kryma. Simferopol´: SGU, 1995. S. 42-47.
5. Ena V.G., Ena Al.V., Ena An.V. Osobo okhranyaemye territorii Kryma//Priroda. 1995. №1. S. 6-16.
6. Ena V.G., Ena Al.V., Ena An.V. Geograficheskoe obosnovanie prirodnogo natsional´nogo parka «Tavrida» //Ukrainskiy geograficheskiy zhurnal. 1998. №1. S. 42-44.
7. Ena V.G., Bokov V.A., Ena Al.V., Ena An.V., Krivobokoe E.M. O prirodnom natsional´nom parke v Krymu// Priroda. 1997. №1-2. S. 2-7.
8. Zheludkovskiy E.O. K strategii Krymskogo rekreatsionnogo territorial´nogo kompleksa. Ukrainskiy geograficheskiy zhurnal. 1993. №4. S. 53-57.
9. Zakon Respubliki Krym «Ob osobo okhranyaemykh prirodnykh territoriyakh Respubliki Krym». №17-ZRK/2014.
10. Karpenko S.A. Lokal´nye ob´´ekty territorial´nogo upravleniya kak geosistemy: podkhody k izucheniyu//Uchenye zapiski TNU: Spetsvypusk. Seriya: Geografiya. 2010. T.24(63). №2. 4.2. S. 231-238.
11. Karpenko S.A., Stefanovich A.N. Konstruktivno-geograficheskoe obespechenie programm territorial´nogo razvitiya na urovne administrativnogo rayona. // Uchenye zapiski TNU: Spetsvypusk. Seriya: Geografiya. 2010. T.24(63). №2. 4.2. S. 26-33.
12. Karpenko S.A., Bokov V.A., Lesov A.M., Lychak A.I. i dr. Kontseptsiya programmy okhrany okruzhayushchey sredy Avtonomnoy Respubliki Krym do 2010 goda. Simferopol´: DiAyPi, 2005.115 s.
13. Kuznetsov M.V. Metodika geografii: osnovy geograficheskoy didaktiki. Simferopol´: TNU, 2010.115 s.
14. Kuznetsov M.V., Kuznetsov M.M. Sotsial´no-geograficheskie vektory adaptatsii turistsko-rekre-atsionnoy sfery Ukrainy v sistemu mezhdunarodnogo turizma// Geopolitika i ekogeodiniami-ka regionov. 2014. T. 10. Vyp. 2. S. 632-636.
15. Ob osobo okhranyaemykh prirodnykh territoriyakh. Federal´nyy zakon ot 14.03.1995 g. №33-F3 (s izmeneniyami ot 30.12.2001 g.).
16. Perspektivy sozdaniya Edinoy prirodookhrannoy seti Kryma / Pod red. V.A. Bokova. Simferopol´: Krymuchpedgiz, 2002. 212 s.
17. Karpenko S.A., Bokov V.A., Lychak A.I. i dr. Razrabotka Skhemy regional´noy ekologicheskoy seti Avtonomnoy Respubliki Krym. Simferopol´: DiAyPi, 2009. 324 s.
18. Bokov V.A., Karpenko S.A., Lychak A.I. i dr. Regional´naya programma formirovaniya natsional´noy ekologicheskoy seti v Avtonomnoy Respublike Krym na period do 2015 goda. Simferopol´: DiAyPi, 2005. 72 s.
19. Sakhnova N.S., Glybchenko M.P. Rol´ geoinformatsionnykh sistem v provedenii geomarketingovykh issledovaniy. Uchenye zapiski TNU. 2012. S. 48-54.
20. ShvetsA.B., Vol´khinD.A. Informatsionnyy imidzh Kryma v sotsiokul´turnykh kontaktakh Rossiyskoy Federatsii i Ukrainy. Etnokul´turnye i mezhkonfessional´nye otnosheniya v Krymu: sb. nauch. trudov. 2011. №3. S. 52-56.
21. Yakovenko IM. Rekreatsionnoe prirodopol´zovanie: metodologiya i metodika issledovaniy. Simferopol´: Tavriya, 2003. 335 s.
22. Yakovenko IM. Geograficheskie tendentsii razvitiya mezhdunarodnogo turizma. Geopolitika i ekodinamika regionov. 2014. T. 10. Vyp. 2. S. 63.
23. Kavaliauskas P. Lithuania: the nature frame. Perspectives on ecological networks. ECNC. Arnhcm, 1996. P. 93-99.
24. Kelleher G., Blcakley C, Wells S. Global Representative System of Marine Protected Areas. 1995. Vol. 1-IV.
25. Miller K. Message from the Chair of WCPA// WCPA Newsletter. IUCN. №82. Oct. 2000.
26. National System Planning for Protected Areas. Main Author: Adrian G. Davey. Best Practice Protected Area Guidelines Series №1. World Commission on Prot. Areas. IUCN. 1998.
